Jessica might have misinterpreted this, as an act of cruelty. However if had been able to get what he wanted people may have felt that he was more of a villain, if he had been able to get his pound of flesh.
Overall I believe that Shylock is both a victim and a villain. I believe that it is fair for Shylock to be punished, but I think the Christians have gone too far to punish him. Having killed Duncan he returns to Lady Macbeth, full of triumph, but then starts to panic when he realises that it is no small thing to kill a king.
The Palestinians are Arabs and have strong An analysis of a victim or a villain against the Jews.
When Birnam Wood comes to Dunsinane, Macbeth dares fate itself and leaves the stronghold to fight in the open. Solanio and Salerio, in my opinion, represent the general Christian point of view, which is complete hatred.
Shylock is shown to be very materialistic in the whole play, but here, when he is offered more money than the bond is woth, he turns it down. Much of what we make of Shylock is determined by the age of the actor, the clothes he wears and the curve of his nose It has always seemed wrong to me to talk of The Merchant of Venice as an anti- or a pro-semitic play.
If we do, then his guilt is greatly lessened. Thus Macbeth dies without ever seeing how evil he has been, without understanding why his life has been meaningless because it has been devoid of honour and human kindness.
This treatment makes Shylock hate Antonio and all Christians. I would suggest that you consider a few things before making up YOUR mind. And, if Macbeth was basically a decent man, why then did he go on to kill the noble Banquo?
To play him as a consummate comedic provocateur, then, as I saw him played by a young and juiced-up actor in Venice, is not at all to rescue him from obloquy. Being human, and an ambitious man, did Macbeth find the temptation of the crown just too hard to resist?
This also, in my view makes Shylock look a victim, as he has done nothing wrong except to be a Jew. I believe that he got more than he deserved for what he did but cannot give him any sympathy because it was his own fault.
Thus Macbeth dies without ever seeing how evil he has been, without understanding why his life has been meaningless because it has been devoid of honour and human kindness. They speak of love and think of money. Having killed Duncan he returns to Lady Macbeth, full of triumph, but then starts to panic when he realises that it is no small thing to kill a king.
He randomly selected the Jews as his scapegoat and launched a massive campaign against them to alienate them from mainstream German society. As this is one of the opening scenes the audience must feel that Shylock is a villain, but they should also be able to see his reasons for it.
He has lost his friends, his reputation and his honour.
Macbeth needs it for Birnam Wood has indeed come to Dunsinane. Afraid for his own skin rather than his soul he decides against killing Duncan.
Were it either it would be less the play it is. This bond may sound like a joke but Shylock was deadly serious. When he does kill the king, the horror of it almost drives him mad, he has murdered his own peace and innocence by killing Duncan.
However, shylocks situation was very different. The Elizabethan audience was for the most part Christian. He also relishes killing Antonio, yet we cannot help but feel that this is not all his fault.
Perhaps he has lost the capacity to care, or has no time to mourn with the enemy advancing, or perhaps his grief goes beyond words?
One thing is for sure, Shakespeare did not want us to think he was a victim in any of this. His hatred is targeted again, because he is a Jew and for no other reason. Iago is an egotist and a cynic, he is only loyal when it serves him and takes it as a personal insult when Cassio is promoted, and pledges his ego to an uncontrollable force to avenge the damage to his ego and superior belief in himself.
To start off with him being a villain, he is a villain to Antonio, as he wants him dead.Expert Analysis Litigation News and Analysis • Legislation • Regulation • Expert Commentary WHITE-COLLAR CRIME Westlaw Journal VOLUME 25, ISSUE 11 /.
Merchant of Venice: Shylock Analysis; In Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice the antagonist of the play is Shylock. Shylock is a wealthy Jewish moneylender.
The villain that we see in Shylock is the greedy moneylender. Shylock charges high interest rates and when he is not repaid he insists on revenge. Shylock, Villain or victim?
The Merchant of Venice June 8th, In the play The Merchant of Venice Shylock is supposed to be the protagonist, the definition of protagonist is; the leading character or a major character in a.
Nov 21, · Basilica santa sabina analysis essay academic festival overture analysis essay cow essay in english, Shylock victim or villain student essays summary of macbeth. 4 stars based on 64 reviews agronumericus.com Essay» Read More. 4 Ways To Keep Your Hair Healthy During Winter.
Vrio analysis for Daisy Buchanan Victim Or Villain case study identified the four main attributes which helps the organization to gain a competitive advantages.
The author of this theory suggests that firm must be valuable. Shylock Villain Or Victim Essay In ‘ The Merchant of Venice ’ is Shylock presented as a victim or a villain? Many people can interpret Shylock as a villainous character which is pictorialized through his on-going battle of revenge against his ‘arch enemy’ Antonio.Download